Total Question


599

Compleated Test


10247

Total Syllabus


60

Visitor Counter


1612

Question - 1 : বাংলাদেশ কত সালে ইসলামী সম্মেলন সংস্থার সদস্যপদ লাভ করে?

a) ১৯৭৪ সালে

b) ১৯৭৫ সালে

c) ১৯৭৩ সালে

d) ১৯৭৬ সালে


Right Answer: a) ১৯৭৪ সালে

Study hall Giving Games propelled this semester: What have we adapted up until now?

The following is an outline of the Altruistic Accounting Report, a nitty gritty effect report arranged by Nicole Sutton of the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). Here Kathryn Mecrow-Flynn, Project Lead of the Giving Game Project, features the key aftereffects of the main semester joining study hall Giving Games into an undergrad bookkeeping course at UTS. This is a follow up to our posts on the association and pilot results.

Foundation

A year ago, the Giving Games Project at The Life You Can Save (TLYCS) cooperated with Nicole Sutton and her group at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), to start the Altruistic Accounting venture. In November 2018, the group led a fruitful pilot with understudy volunteers. Our past blog entries, connected in the presentation, really expound on the Altruistic Accounting venture, including the structure and design of the activity, and its points and targets.

What did the Altruistic Accounting venture do?

Nicole and her training group ran study hall Giving Games during a week by week undergrad instructional exercise class, which centers around choice procedures and inclinations. The course runs two times per year with a companion every semester of around 300-400 understudies.

Viability: How all around did the movement act in the homeroom? Did it meet the learning goals? How all around did it convey the key ideas of the course to understudies?

An aggregate of 172 understudies gave reactions by means of the in-class surveying programming and 114 reacted in post-action polls. Shockingly, because of issues with surveying programming and overview organization, not all understudies gave reactions to all inquiries. We will be improving this procedure for the subsequent Semester. Furthermore, 2 understudies volunteered to be met. At long last, five out of the six educators who encouraged at any rate one homeroom Giving Game finished a post-movement survey.

What were the outcomes?

1. Effect

a. Changes in demeanors towards giving

The table beneath shows the aftereffects of the study hall Giving Games on understudies' demeanors towards giving to not-for-profits. This was surveyed by asking understudies when the Giving Game to choose the most significant factor while picking where to give. This varies from a standard Giving Game where members are approached to rank six factors arranged by significance.

Our outcomes show a noteworthy move in understudy's frames of mind, with an expansion in the number and extent of understudies choosing significant components.

b. Changes in plans or expectations

Plan changes were estimated through the vote results, revealed changes in expectations towards beneficent giving and ability to connect further (for example membership rates).

As far as casting a ballot results, between the primary vote and the last vote, there was a solid move toward high-sway charities (GiveDirectly and the Fred Hollows Foundation). By the last vote, under 15% chose the low effect choice (The Smith Family), a lessening from 33% of all votes at first. Likewise, 21.6% of all understudies changed from a low to a high effect philanthropy, considerably more than the 5.2% who changed from a high to low effect alternative.

As far as understudies expressed changes in goals, understudies revealed that they would be increasingly considered in settling on gift choices, endeavor to be 'progressively balanced', review their very own predispositions, accomplish more research, and reevaluate their choice criteria:

One territory of progress is the generally low number of understudies who decided to buy in to different follow-up pamphlets or offers for additional data. This would appear to demonstrate that while they see the general estimation of compelling giving standards, so far, they don't see the significance of the extra assets offered by the action. This will be a center spotlight on progress in the following semester.

C. Cash Moved to Effective Nonprofits

As a victor adopts all-strategy was utilized, nine classes chose for offer $100 to The Fred Hollows Foundation ($900 altogether) and one class decide to offer $100 to Give Directly. Altogether $1000 was given to successful philanthropies by understudies for the UTS Business School.

2. Viability

The educators surveyed the Giving Game as profoundly successful at showing the significance of bookkeeping to regions of social effect, 4.4 out of 5, "exceptionally viable" and "amazingly compelling", and to helping understudies comprehend basic leadership ideas, 4 out of 5, "powerful." However, the group found that the movement could be improved as far as how easily it ran inside the time period accessible, and how to guarantee a higher consistency as far as understudy support and commitment.

3. Seen an incentive to educators and understudies:

As far as the quantitative appraisals, understudies scored the homeroom Giving Game exceptionally. When asked how likely understudies is prescribe going to a Giving Game to somebody they knew, the normal score was 7.5 out of 10. This expanded to 7.7 when gotten some information about the degree to which future understudies would discover the assignment important. There were not many understudies who didn't discover the movement important. For instance, when gotten some information about the incentive to future bookkeeping understudies just 2 understudies (3% of responders) gave it a rating beneath 5 out of 10. These outcomes were strengthened by evaluations from instructors, who when asked the degree to which they figured future bookkeeping understudies would discover this undertaking significant, gave a score of 8.6 out of 10.

Where next?

In light of the open doors distinguished in these outcomes, in July 2019, The Altruistic Accounting Project was granted an UTS Social Impact Grant from the UTS Center for Social Justice and Inclusion, to support the gifts and operational expenses for directing Giving Games at UTS in October 2019. We are fantastically satisfied and appreciative for this help.

In view of this information, The Giving Games Project and Altruistic Accounting group will cooperate to use the open doors for development distinguished, explicitly improving procedure viability and membership rates. We are supported by these underlying outcomes and mindfully hopeful about the potential for sway made by homeroom Giving Games. We will discharge further information as it becomes accessible after the subsequent semester.

We wish to cheer Nicole and her group for their difficult work, devotion, and responsibility, both to acquainting many understudies with high effect charity and to organizing the advancement of strong effect following.